Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duygu Sarışın

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 14:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duygu Sarışın[edit]

Duygu Sarışın (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENT and WP:GNG. No significant roles etc, not in-depth coverage in news... Non-notable. Kemalcan (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Kemalcan (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Kemalcan (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Kemalcan (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Kemalcan (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Her roles in tv-series are not significant. Sources 1 to 4 in the article are regular "Who is X" kind of publications which are made for almost every slightly-known person, not WP:SIGCOV. Others don't count towards WP:GNG as source 5 is a namedrop, source 6 is about what she said and source 7 is about her going on vacation. I found one interview here, but that also doesn't count towards GNG. The search Duygu Sarışın -kimdir -ulusoy (to exclude sources about her relationship with Çağatay Ulusoy) doesn't result in any further coverage. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 15:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment A similar discussion is going hand in hand with this one on the Turkish Wikipedia, so I'm curious to see if a user there can establish notability, though based on what I have seen so far she's probably not notable based on our criteria. Keivan.fTalk 02:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keivan.f Actually, similar comments has made on TurkishWiki so far. Lack of leading/important roles and sketchy coverage in news do not meet for the notability criterias.--Kemalcan (talk) 07:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 14:38, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, sorry for the late reply, the article doesn't seem to be notable, as the actress don't have a lot of leading roles or recognition, maybe in the future if they have notable roles, it might be applicable and adequate to create article on the actress, furthermore the article on Turkish Wikipedia has been deleted, so it's better to delete from English Wikipedia too, and in the future there will be more reliable and adequate sources. Thank you. Tahaaleem Talk 07:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.