Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duwayne Ewart
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 19:51, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Duwayne Ewart[edit]
- Duwayne Ewart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This player does not appear to have played for a first-tier professional team. Play for national youth teams is likewise not ipso facto qualifying, and there is no evidence of general notability guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - In the interest of preserving the discussion, I am copying the nominators rationale from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duwayne Ewart (2nd nomination). Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- This individual does not appear to have played for a first-tier professional team. See association football notability guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- The guideline you link to makes no reference to a "first-tier" professional team, it only requires that the subject have played in a fully professional league -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- This individual does not appear to have played for a first-tier professional team. See association football notability guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - He has played in the USL, a fully pro league per WP:FPL, meaning the article meets WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - meets WP:NFOOTBALL; needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 21:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Easily satisfies notability standards, and do remember that AFD is not cleanup. Smartyllama (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes NFOOTY, has played in a fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. Fenix down (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per GiantSnowman - I couldn't put it any better myself - It does simply need improving and it does meet NFOOTBALL. –Davey2010Talk 10:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.