Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dustin Harding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dustin Harding[edit]

Is not (yet) a notable actor. Appears to have had only minor roles in a handful of movies. I have not seen these films myself, and I welcome input from anyone who has, but what information is available on them does not indicate that any of these roles would satisfy notability criteria for entertainers. Jvr725 (talk) 00:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The fact that the actor is credited with roles in notable productions is what is required to establish notability per WP:ENTERTAINER. See the current helpful discussion at Sonia Darrin Esasus (talk) 04:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The criteria per WP:ENTERTAINER is not merely that the actor be credited, but "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films" (emphasis mine). If only a credit is required, we could just add every listing on IMDb. The Sonia Darrin discussion establishes that she played a memorable part in a film and if someone can say the same for this young man I'd be happy to reconsider. Based on the information relating to his parts in the few productions listed, this does not appear likely.Jvr725 (talk) 05:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:ENTERTAINER doesn't say anything about being credited or not. The criteria is whether the person has had significant roles, and I don't think "Boy #1" qualifies. --L. Pistachio (talk) 08:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The Boy #1 role was the first in his career. I think we should actually focus on his two most recent roles where his name appears on the credits on the film's main page and not buried somewhere in the list. His roles in Praise to the Man and One Man's Treasure appear to be significant, although I can't say for sure without seeing the productions or at least a good synopsis. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Upon further examination of those roles, I still don't think he meets WP:ENTERTAINER. The two films you mentioned appear to be productions of the Mormon church rather than actual feature films. As such, I wouldn't consider them to be major productions (note that neither of the wikilinks you provided actually links to an article about the film). I am still of the opinion that he is not notable. --L. Pistachio (talk) 17:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Pistachio. THF (talk) 14:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.