Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dushmeenoi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 09:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dushmeenoi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not even released, no RS and not notable for films. Tyros1972 Talk 11:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - if it exists, then stubbify and rewrite. Eddie.willers (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I have already edited grammar, stubbified, and bulleted this article. However, it still needs citation. If anyone can find a reference, that would be great. Thank you! PinkTruffles123 (talk) 20:22, 19 June 2013 (UTC)PinkTruffles123[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete I prettied up the article and found its actual name for searches. In looking for the director and actors, I found that IMDB has a 2002 release date as Dushmani,[1] but this could be based upon either a DVD release of the earlier release or release (as with most Indian films before their release) of soundtrack music. There even seems to be a few sites that offer the film and/or its music for download, but I cannot find any confirmation in reliable sources. Pointy here being, the project fails WP:NF. Allow back only if its release can be confirmed and only if it is shown to have received the requisite coverage (maybe under a different name). Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:00, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.