Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dus Bahane 2.0

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz Read! Talk! 19:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dus Bahane 2.0[edit]

Dus Bahane 2.0 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The song hasn't been a bit hit (Hindi songs can receive a billion views) nor has it won awards or had many independent articles. Songs with a billion views like "Cham Cham" have no articles (views alone mean nothing). No independent notability. The only information about the song is that it is a remake of another song. Propose to merge this short article to Baaghi 3#Soundtrack.

These song articles created by the same user should also be deleted and be merged to their respective films.

The reason why they should all be deleted because the songs don't have independent notability. Half of the sources are from YouTube. Other sources are from unreliable sources. None of these songs won any awards. There are 5 to 6 songs+ per film and we can't have a Wikipedia article on a song simply because you like the song. DareshMohan (talk) 12:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think the songs have sufficient notability to be kept. A reminder to the nominator: If you want additional articles to be deleted, you need to add the appropriate AfD notice to each of them. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 16:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC) Postscript: I added the AfD notice to the three additional articles because the nominator hadn't. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 21:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Nominator is reminded that every article that is being considered needs to be tagged as being part of this discussion. Also, I don't see how an article can "be deleted and be merged", I think you have that backwards. It would also be helpful if, when you make a nomination, you use the tools available to do some deletion sorting so that editors interested in this subject can be aware of this AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.