Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durpang (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and move to Drupang. As Onel5969 pointed out, this is likely a typo and there is agreement that the place is to be kept if sources exist. Sources exist for "Drupang", so moving there is the correct outcome. So Why 12:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Durpang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This unsourced page contains no indication of significance or notability. It's also in almost the exact same state it was in during the last AfD a year ago, in which no argument was made to keep the page. Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 21:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's a populated place, don't we keep those? --do ncr am 17:57, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does the fact that it exists and is populated automatically establish notability? The page is unsourced and the only info I could find on it merely claim its existence or give some directory info. I don't know about you, but that doesn't sound like notability to me. Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 20:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per WP:GEOLAND, which doncram alluded to but didn't link. Smartyllama (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless someone can find a reliable source showing this place exists and is officially recognized. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – There is a village with similar name in the district of the above village – Drupang Gaon (gaon is a Hindi term which means village). There's also a village in another state – Durpang forest camp – which has partial matching name. But I couldn't find an exact match. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Can't find any sources to show this particular place actually exists. Which is rare. And regarding WP:GEOLAND, as Clarityfriend pointed out, it's not just that a populated place exists, but that it is officially recognized. There's a great resource for India geoplaces, Census2011. I can find no listing for a village named Durpang in this district. NitinMlk's search might show that the title for this article is simply a typo. Since there is no article currently for Drupang, Might I suggest that the nom withdraw their nomination, and we simply move the page to the correct spelling? And use NitinMlk's citation? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 18:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GEOLAND. CJK09 (talk) 20:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move per Onel5969 eas it seems likeliest that the current name is indeed a typo. —GrammarFascist _contribs ^talk 23:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Onel5969, as WP:V trumps WP:GEOLAND. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.