Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durov Animal Theater

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:35, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Durov Animal Theater[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY, and Russian article has little to add in terms of information, sourcing or evidence for notability. Boleyn (talk) 20:32, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- meets GNG per available sources: Google books: "one of a kind" etc. This news article describes the 105 history of the theatre: "Moscow Durov Animal Theater Celebrates 105th anniversary" (can be read via Google translate). More sources likely exist in Russian. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The news article is good. There's a documentary film about the theater [1]. Given the long history, it's very unlikely that there aren't more sources in Russian (which I have no chance of finding). I think notability can be assumed here. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination I've clearly been too harsh here. Thanks for the comments above, Boleyn (talk) 09:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.