Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durgesh Kaushik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 12:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Durgesh Kaushik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person and article seems to be written by the person himself; Notability not estabished by cited articles; Citations are promotional in nature and Linkedin/Facebook/Social Media profiles cannot be used as citations on Wikipedia User:ParadiseStark (talk) 16:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - are these enough? [1] [2] [3] Spiderone 12:04, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Spiderone CAPTAIN RAJU^(T)

I believe that much more independent recognition and coverage is required for a person to be included on Wikipedia. Only two of the articles shown by Spiderone cover the mentioned person in detail. Citing [[4]], a biographical page can be created if the person fulfils the following criteria: 1. The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times. 2. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. 3. The person has an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography or similar publication.

The mentioned person doesn't meet any of the above criteria as of now. He may be on his way to become notable as he has achieved a lot, but as of now, the article doesn't deserve to be online. To cite a couple of cases, Rajan Anandan, one of the most prominent angel investors in India and Head of Google South Asia and Zishaan Hayath, Founder Toppr and another prominent angel investor do not have Wikipedia pages.

We need to maintain a certain standard for notability which, in my opinion, is not fulfilled here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ParadiseStark (talk • contribs) 09:49, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - appears to fail GNG Spiderone 17:06, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability: Verified FB profile with 140K followers. 11K LinkedIn followers. Mentions in news - neutral sources like: vccircle.com/ten-stealth-startups-that-will-mark-second-coming-of-founders-former-cxos/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.129.60.72 (talk) 06:16, 27 August 2017‎ (IP comment moved from top of page and signature added.Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC) )[reply]

Facebook and LinkedIn don't count towards notability I'm afraid Spiderone 09:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.