Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunlop English Medium School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sahaganj#Education. So Why 18:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dunlop English Medium School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another of those non-notable schools....this time I cannot even find a govt listing....~~Blatantly promotional~~Struck per Kudpung's advice below — F R ⁺ 13:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 13:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Somewhere near to my erstwhile residence and no minimal non-trivial coverage.........∯WBG^converse 13:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All high schools are notable. I removed some promotional text. Eastmain (talk • contribs)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Sahaganj#Education, where it's listed. The article as is doesn't have any notable detail to mention besides that it names its principal. The Sahaganj article has a lot of writeup on Dunlop corporation, so it's natural that Dunlop school would fit in with this. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sahaganj#Education, per policy where it's listed. That said, there is absolutely nothing whatsoever promotional, blatant or otherwise, in the short neutral text about this school. Perhaps this is one reason why new and inexperienced users should first familiarise themselves with policies and guidelines before nominating, closing, or otherwise participating in AfD discussions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung - This version of the article may provide you with some insight into why I called it promotional. Thanks — F R ⁺ 10:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So? It's not there now though. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:31, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that you refactor your vote statement above in light of the reply I have given. If you feel that I am editing contrary to established policies (as you have hinted above), please feel free to explain it to me at my talk page — F R ⁺ 10:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung — F R ⁺ 11:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be asking the same question at some corp-article? Umm......∯WBG^converse 12:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And, please retract the last line which is a borderline PA. Whilst I respect you a lot as someone who has shepherded the NPP process for a long span of time, there's no need to be so unwilling to assume good faith with relatively new users.∯WBG^converse 12:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Sahaganj seems the best option here, given the lack of source material. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:40, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.