Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duncan Doughnuts (Radio)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 00:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duncan Doughnuts (Radio)[edit]

This is the fourth time someone has tried to dlete this but Duncan Doughnuts (Radio) works on the same radio show as Tim Shaw ,who has an article, and therefore should be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford Prefect 2 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 1 December 2006

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable radio personality. No sources at all, let alone verifiable third-party sources. The fact that another person on the show has an article does not in any way imply that this person deserves an article too. In fact, it may indicate that the other personality, Tim Shaw, should also be nominated for an AfD though I don't have time to do so right now. --The Way 16:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:BIO, needs reliable and independent sources. Does not assert any notabilit anyway. Ter e nc e Ong 16:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As long as Tim Shaw has an article, according to logic, this article should be kept as I prieviously stated. This is virtually the only Duncan Doughnuts article on the internet also. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ford Prefect 2 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Delete non-notable, "this is virtually the only Duncan Doughnuts article on the internet" is about as clear an indication of non-notability as one could ask for! Arguments about other articles are irrelevant (see WP:INN), but if someone wants to nominate the Tim Shaw article, I'm sure we can judge that one on its merits as well. Xtifr _tälk 20:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:BIO... and surfing to Mr. Shaw...SkierRMH,09:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ You people make me sick. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ford Prefect 2 (talk • contribs) 09:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment This is the second time Ford Prefect 2 has expressed his desired to keep this article. Not that we're voting. But if we were, that would be a duplicate, so I have added strike marks as a reminder. This editor's opinion of his fellow editors hardly seems relevant to the topic at hand. Which is to say, that's not much of an argument. Some might even consider it a personal attack. I choose to overlook that possibility, but suggest that an argument based on Wikipedia policies or guidelines might be more effective than one based on the delicacy of your stomach. :) Xtifr _tälk 18:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable -- Steve Hart 14:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if Juicy Lucy doesn't have a page, then Duncan should not have one.--Tim Shao 20:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.