Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dujso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dujso[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The surname exists but it's extremely rare - see My Heritage and Acta Croatica. In fact, there are currently no articles on people with this surname on Wikipedia, so there is no potential to quickly convert this into a disambiguation page. I couldn't see any significant coverage of this surname in my searches of 'Dujso' and 'Дујсо' so possibly fails WP:GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - see similar AfDs for Goc-ong and Egot. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As a topic it doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG; the coverage at My Heritage and Acta Croatica is routine. As a disambiguation page it isn't needed since we don't have articles on any people named Dujso at this time. Daß Wölf 20:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is way past time we stopped limiting the proposed deletion option to unreferneced BLPs and opened it to every unreferenced article we have.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. Or, failing that, a speedy delete option. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Bonus question: can you guess the last name of the article's creator? No such user (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.