Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duck face

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 17:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duck face[edit]

Comedic, unencyclopedic subject and content. No sources. No sources on google (this may be a neologism). Lambton ^T/_C 05:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Redirect. The article on Gurn that this one links to is more complete and already includes the term "duck face" as a localized name for the same thing; I see no reason for two articles. However, the Gurn article could use more sourcing. Duncan1800 (talk) 05:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gurn. It does talk about it. Doczilla (talk) 06:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gurn. This would be the best source of information for someone that wants information on the topic. Jd027^chat 17:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.