Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duck, Duck, Goose!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to D. C. Douglas. Closing as "redirect" rather than "delete" given that no arguments have been made against redirecting specifically; however, there is consensus that a standalone article isn't appropriate at this time, and any re-creation would need to be backed by substantively better sourcing. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duck, Duck, Goose![edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG—No references or coverage. Picked up by minor film festivals. I'm not seeing anything that would suggest notability. BriefEdits (talk) 23:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 23:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch. Lol!DCDouglas 23:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misterdc (talk • contribs)

Misterdc (talk · contribs), are you aware of any film reviews about Duck, Duck, Goose! from reliable sources? The film will be considered notable per Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline if there are at least two film reviews about it. Cunard (talk) 12:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Found this [1] at Film Threat DonaldD23 talk to me 17:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG—No RS - lots of film festivals mentioned, but otherwise not secondary commenting. Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to D. C. Douglas (with the history preserved under the redirect) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. I support a redirect to the article for the director of the film where the film is already discussed. Preserving the history will allow for a selective merge and for the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard (talk) 12:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG—No RS. The only listed source is IMDB, which being crowd sourced, could have been posted by the film's creators. There's no sourcing to indicate this as notable or even credible as a real film short. — Maile (talk) 01:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to D. C. Douglas per nom. While the source provided above is good, we need more than one to show notability. Link20XX (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to D. C. Douglas KylieTastic (talk) 19:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.