Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubai Science Park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. plicit 03:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubai Science Park[edit]

Dubai Science Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing to indicate that the subject is notable. It's a non-notable company that is framed as "a business community". If there is anything worth keeping, it can be merged with Dubai Holding, which is the company that owns this subsidiary. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Neighbourhoods are notable. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 11:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment per WP:GEOFEAT 2 "...commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability.", with that said, here is a source assess table:

Source assessment table: prepared by User:Snood1205
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
"How a focus on science can help the economy grow". The National. Retrieved 2021-11-15. No ? Yes No
"TECOM creates new Dubai Science Park after merger - Technology". ArabianBusiness.com. 2015-10-19. Retrieved 2021-11-15. No ~ Yes No
"Startups, SMEs account for 40 per cent of Dubai Science Park's business partners". www.mediaoffice.ae. 8 September 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-15. No No Yes No
"'Stuck' Offers a Unique View of the Difficulties Faced by People With Paralysis". Branding in Asia Magazine. 2021-08-23. Retrieved 2021-11-15. ? ? Yes ? Unknown
"Healthcare Drive Sees Dubai Science Park Attract Leading Global Companies in 2020". www.mediaoffice.ae. 25 January 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-15. No No Yes No
"Dubai Science Park Products & Services". Dsp.ae. Retrieved 2017-03-23. No Yes Yes No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

I will note, this seems to appear in a number of books as well, but the books are either: trivially mentioning the park or are promotional. I could not find any WP:RS about it, and therefore per WP:GEOFEAT this currently fails. Having said that, with the sheer number of mentions it is odd there are are not any WP:RS and hence I think it is possible this article could be kept if there are reliable sources about the science park. With the number of companies there, and number of hits on google for it there should be something. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 14:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep, I have found a couple of independent sources.[1][2]

References

  1. ^ "Top Ministry official visits Dubai Science Park". Khaleej Times. 27 June 2021. Retrieved 16 November 2021.
  2. ^ Cook, Terry; Riches, Clive; Taylor, Richard (2021). Cambridge International AS & A Level Complete Economics: Student Book (Second Edition). OUP Oxford. p. 170. ISBN 9781382029933.

SailingInABathTub (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep thanks to the additional sources presented by SailingInABathTub NemesisAT (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as the independent sources show notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 14:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.