Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duane Vander Klok

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duane Vander Klok[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vander Klok has not been the subject of coverage sufficent to satisfy the general notability guideline, and I can find nothing to indicate notability under the guideline for authors. Google only returns a few mentions of his books and coverage from sources related to his church and TV show. A Google News search returns some very brief mentions in a local paper, but no significant coverage. -- Lear's Fool 05:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 05:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 05:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 05:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 06:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:13, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Published works support notability Rirunmot (talk) 00:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 16:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Qworty. Barkeep^{Chat | $} 21:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. Being a published author does not establish notability, especially when there does not appear to be any independent critical review of the books in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:15, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.