Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dušan Poliaček
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dušan Poliaček[edit]
- Dušan Poliaček (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD (seconded) twice removed by creator, without comment or improvement. The article is comprised mainly of unsourced appraisal of the subject's work (WP:POV). Of the references provided:
- http://worldtrip.tv/themap/index.php?archivoffset=22 (Spiegel Online is just a very brief mention
- http://designtaxi.com/news.php?id=2252 - very brief mention of the subject, site or its article is not about the subject
- http://www.zivel.cz/index.php?content=article&id=283 is something he has written on a blog and is neither biographical nor autobiographical
- http://www.czechdesign.cz/index.php?status=c&clanek=780&lang1 a non notable website having an article about an exhibition that includes an extremely short mention of the subjec's name. Kudpung (talk) 11:17, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —Kudpung (talk) 11:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —Kudpung (talk) 11:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not establish notability.Jeppiz (talk) 12:05, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no reliable sources indicating notability per WP:CREATIVE. Poliaček wrote an article for Živel (a very good magazine, btw) and he is briefly mentioned at the website www.czechdesign.cz. That's not enough. The information on his award (Excellent Design Award) is unverifiable. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.