Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drummoyne Presbyterian Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drummoyne Presbyterian Church[edit]

Non-notable church. Prod removed by the creator: Juliangamble with comment: it is noteworthy! Now Julian, please note, the question is actually not whether the church is notable but whether you have managed to make it sound notable in your Wikipedia article. And patently you have not. -- RHaworth 19:06, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Melchoir 19:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Grafikm_fr 19:28, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hirudo 19:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Most individual churches are not notable enough to warrant Wikipedia articles anyway. --Metropolitan90 22:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would be curious to know why individual schools are notable but individual churches are not. Thatcher131 04:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, anyone can set up a Church, whereas setting up a school requires government endorsement. I feel that makes the former more liable to be cruftish. Andjam 02:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A search of an Australian Newspaper database comes up with one hit a brief mention in the Daily Telegraph What's On column. There is a lack of verifiable information indicating notability as shown in this Google search [1].Capitalistroadster 02:58, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. --Roisterer 06:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ambi 01:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability, article is useless (It mentions an address and pastor, but Wikipedia is not the yellow pages). Andjam 02:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --cj | talk 06:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.