Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drilon Ajeti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drilon Ajeti[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NFOOTY, WP:BIO and WP:GNG KylieTastic (talk) 19:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG WP:NFOOTBALL, I'm surprised this was approved at AfC. I'm also curious to learn from the article's creator the reason behind contesting its PROD. Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 19:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:28, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:46, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - semi-professional footballer with no evidence of meeting GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Don't delete - He is a professional footballer who plays in the top tier of Kosovan football Ardihaliti2000^{(Talk to Ardi)} 02:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Kosovo league is not fully professional. Ajeti does not have significant coverage.--Mvqr (talk) 11:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Don't delete~~ - The Kosovan super league has professional players, it clearly states it in their recent player status document, the players make more than enough to live without extra financial work, Kosovo Super league Player Status Ardihaliti2000^{(Talk to Ardi)} 11:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Don't delete~~ - The page where it shows the Kosovan league to be non professional uses a source from 2017, where as the football in Kosovo has evolved and has become professional as seen by the 2021 document, shown in my previous postArdihaliti2000^{(Talk to Ardi)} 19:36, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ardihaliti2000: please do not make multiple !votes. Comments are fine. Giant Snowman 19:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

note I have mentioned this and the claim they are now fully professional Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Fully_professional_leagues#Football_Superleague_of_Kosovo so the football project can decide to update or refute. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 19:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - in terms of GNG, the sources offered do not meet the requirements. Please see my comments below and let me know if you disagree with anything:

Source	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/drilon-ajeti/profil/spieler/858949	Unreliable source	Stats only	✘ No
https://topsporti.com/artikulli/llapi-e-rrezon-ballkanin-nga-kreu		Not mentioned	✘ No
https://topsporti.com/artikulli/formacionet-zyrtare-malisheva-ulpiana/ffk-superliga-e-kosoves		Squad list mention	✘ No
https://topsporti.com/artikulli/ulpiana-ilaci-per-skuadrat-e-medha-mposhte-ballkanin-me-permbysje/ffk-superliga-e-kosoves		Not mentioned	✘ No
https://topsporti.com/artikulli/superliga-formacioni-i-javes-15/ffk-superliga-e-kosoves		No detailed analysis of Ajeti specifically	✘ No
https://topsporti.com/artikulli/merlaku-siguron-piken-te-rrezikuarit-barazojne/ffk-superliga-e-kosoves		Not mentioned	✘ No
https://ulpianapress.net/portieri-i-ulpianes-ftohet-nga-kombetarja-e-konfirmon-klubi-lipjanas/		Passing mention	✘ No
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/drilon-ajeti/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/858949	Unreliable source	Stats	✘ No
http://www.ffk-kosova.com/llapi-fiton-kupen-e-kosoves-siguron-daljen-ne-evrope/		Not mentioned	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:00, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks SIGCOV to warrant a GNG pass.VirenRaval89 (talk) 12:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - At the moment the subject does not seem to have played at a high enough level or to have achieved the level of coverage that would be need for him to have an article. Dunarc (talk) 21:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Devokewater ^(talk) 21:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.