Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Driftwood (2016 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Driftwood (2016 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with no sources. Prod tag removed by the original author with no explanation, so listing here for discussion. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 21:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator. Also pinging @McGeddon: who originally applied the prod template _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 21:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Proposed Deletion The wikipedia page is not quite complete yet, It is a group effort and i am waiting on information from several group members so I can complete the page. attempted to add an explanation after removing Prod tag but was unable to.

Jayman89 (talk) 21:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFF as it's a future film which has not been "confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography". It lacks even a single source to confirm that it or any of the people involved exist - all I can find online is a YouTube trailer uploaded yesterday. --McGeddon (talk) 22:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Delete I aplogise if i have skipped any specific guidelines here, I have just created the wikipedia article in preparation for our roll out, I can delete the page and resubmit once all the information is available (possibly within 3 or 4 days). the film is complete and a media roll out will begin shortly tho. Thank You and apologies for any guidelines i may have breached.

Jayman89 (talk) 22:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The bigger concern here is not the article's completeness, more the inherent notability of it's subject matter. You may find the guidance at Wikipedia:Notability (films) of use. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 05:54, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if this is your own work, you might read up on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 06:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom Charlie the Pig (talk) 23:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's hardly much. SwisterTwister talk 01:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.