Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamstime (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamstime[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has superficial referenciness but the sources are all recycled press releases. I don't see any substantive independent coverage at all. Guy (Help!) 21:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC) Guy (Help!) 21:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've contributed to this page several times during the last 2 or 3 years. There are not many references about the industry but I find the content relevant for the users. The stock industry is very important for millions of photographers around the world and they need to be informed about the way they can monetize their content. HelenaD 12:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helenadobre (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO / WP:TOOSOON; the company is not yet notable per available sources, which are mostly promotionally angled. Content belongs on the company web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not adhere to Wiki standards. Seems like merely a corporate spam/ directory Light2021 (talk) 17:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.