Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drawn from Bees

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 23:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Drawn from Bees[edit]

Speedy declined. Appears to fail WP:BAND. References provided do not suggest more than trivial coverage. Only one released album. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 00:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of notability. JJL (talk) 01:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Google search reveals 3,600,000+ results... Ceranthor 01:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Ceranthor 00:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually less that 6000 google hits

Delete - No news articles, no awards, limited releases - nothing that satisfies the general requirements of WP:BAND - Peripitus (Talk) 01:27, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Cerejota (talk) 09:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only hits I can find are mostly mp3 download sites, lyrics sites, and 1-liners in local papers announcing they will be performing in such-and-such club. Arakunem^Talk 16:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.