Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dravida Vizhipunarchi Kazhagam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus was reached in this discussion. @Twotwice: thanks for helping with the AfD process, but discussions should not generally be relisted more than twice. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 07:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dravida Vizhipunarchi Kazhagam[edit]

Dravida Vizhipunarchi Kazhagam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability or ever having held a seat in any government. Unsourced since birth and I wasn't able to find any sources on a search. ♠PMC(talk) 04:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 04:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 04:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 08:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted after contributions were made to improve the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Two, twicetalk 22:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.