Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonstar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dragonstar[edit]
- Dragonstar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable role playing game. Blowdart | talk 13:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Fantasy Flight Games unless sources are provided that establish this topic's notability on its own. --Explodicle (T/C) 15:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not willing to pay the subscription fee to view the non-self-published sources, so I'm striking out my !vote. --Explodicle (T/C) 07:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bundle and Renom I just spoke with the author on his talk page. I think the rpg articles should be bundled and renommed. Currently the nom is running into issues with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I did find (and add)
threefour reviews for various sourcebooks for the game. Citations are, of course, nice to have, but I think this demonstrates sufficient notability. --Craw-daddy | T | 23:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Keep: It is a published gaming book by a notable publisher, and nom has failed to tender any explanation of why this game is not notable. Ravenswing 23:25, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Reviews are sufficient to show notability. Hobit (talk) 03:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.