Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Mania Legends

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Chompy Ace 14:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Dragon Mania Legends[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NVG. Chompy Ace 13:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Chompy Ace 13:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, only has one review from GameZebo I could find._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, in addition to the review by GameZebo here, I was able to find coverage of an update in Pocket Gamer, here, and a review in Windows Central here. All three of these sources are reliable according to WP:VG/RS, meaning this game passes WP:GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:38, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable yes, but updates are trivial mentions. If a site couldn't give the time of day to review a game, they probably regard it as not important or notable._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, it’s still an entire article dedicated to the game, and even if we discounted it we would still have two sources, just enough for a GNG pass. Devonian Wombat (talk) 20:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where I draw the line is whether it has critical commentary or is just a glorified press release. That article is the latter._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:42, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Captain Galaxy 19:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.