Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DragonFire (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DragonFire (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Denied prod without explanation. Concern was "Unreferenced article with no evidence of meeting the notability criteria for unreleased films". I echo this concern and having not found any sources, this may be a hoax. BOVINEBOY2008 12:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per my earlier Prod rationale. AllyD (talk) 12:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It could almost be done speedily given the lack of content. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is clearly not notable and given that the name of the original editor looks like it's a filming house, I'm going to guess that this is a purely promotional edit. It hasn't even started filming yet, assuming it ever will.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing showing up on this particular Dragonfire on a search (as opposed to other "Dragonfire" films). No coverage in reliable, independent, third-party sources to get us notability. Churn and change (talk) 05:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, sounds like a hoax to me. No serious investor is going to give you money to film in all those exotic locations if the film features a Bond knockoff called "James Bob". Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 14:07, 30 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Delete - Really? There is absolutely zero coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. James Bob, eh? More seriously, this has no cast, no crew, no director, no release date, no coverage in even unreliable sources and no chance of being a real film. The creator's namesake, Rattlesnake Pictures, doesn't appear to exist in any capacity either. At best, this is WP:CRYSTAL. More likely, this is a pure fabrication. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 21:59, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.