Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drag Race Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to draft, as this appears to be widely supported, and an appropriate resolution for a subject expected to gain substantial coverage in the future. BD2412 T 02:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drag Race Australia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:GNG. Little information is know about the commission of the franchise. We don't even know the confirmed title - some of the international franchises have titled differently, no broadcast or network details or even details of judges, or dates. This is far too soon. ≫ (Lil-Unique1) -{ Talk }- 18:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ≫ (Lil-Unique1) -{ Talk }- 18:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TOOSOON Davidstewartharvey (talk) 18:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Draftify this is one of many spin-offs from the immensely popular original and its ever-expanding brandings. This is only a question of when it hits the tipping point to meet GNG, which is arguably quite soon. So we’re just quibbling that it’s a week or month too soon, and nothing will really change, a bit more added, and the whole thing moved back to article space. I say leave it as an acceptable well-written, well-sourced stub, and it will grow like every other article. Gleeanon409 (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: Its time will come, but it isn't a high quality article yet. TimeEngineer (talk) 04:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would support to draftify the article - it has been created speculatively. I do believe the series will go ahead but until it has a broadcaster, confirmed panel and date its far too soon. ≫ (Lil-Unique1) -{ Talk }- 22:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or draftify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify has potential, but not suitable for mainspace currently. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:NOTJUSTYET Hekerui (talk) 16:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist - Delete or draftify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 18:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify. While I agree this is WP:TOOSOON, the subject will likely be notable when the series debuts, and I see no reason why the useful prose should be removed when drafity is an option which is encouraged in situations like this as an alternative to deletion. I would disagree with the WP:CRYSTAL rationale cited by the nominator, as the series has been reported in news sources and was anything but unverifiable speculation. The TOOSOON rationale cited by the two opposes, while true, does not preclude the option of draftification --Dps04 (talk) 14:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftity: no dispute about it not belonging in the mainspace per WP:CRYSTAL/whatever but the series is likely to take place and the page can be usefully moved to draftspace for collaboration and improvements as more information is available. — Bilorv (talk) 16:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.