Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Louise Porter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Louise Porter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Appears to be an unremarkable person. All sources go to personal website or publishing firms. No substantial coverage. Also, incredibly spammy and possibly written by subject themselves. Christopher Connor (talk) 21:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Louise Porter is in no way an unremarkable person. She is a writer so of course there will be links to publishing firms. I think this is a comprehensive page and is a true representation of Dr Porter and what she has accomplished. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PortiaScott (talk • contribs) 21:55, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete references not sufficient to meet the requirements of WP:BIO, particularly given that this is a living person so WP:BLP issues need to be taken into account. Nick-D (talk) 08:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent sources found. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:09, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, no sources Vartanza (talk) 00:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable third party sources proving that they are notable, reads like an Advert/Resume. Bidgee (talk) 07:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, there being no reliable third-party sources. Frickeg (talk) 11:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{Rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron. SnottyWong ^comment 22:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
CLARIFY: The article under discussion here was tagged for {{Rescue}} by anonymous IP 32.175.27.245 [1] in seeking assistance with its improvement. ---- 05:44, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless non-primary sources can be found which establish notability. SnottyWong ^comment 22:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - on behalf of ARS, I gave this a pretty thorough search, but she doesn't meet WP:GNG or any of the criteria of WP:ACADEMIC. Claritas § 20:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.