Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Karen J Stevens PhD
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:40, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dr Karen J Stevens PhD[edit]
- Dr Karen J Stevens PhD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking GHits of substance and with zero GNEWS coverage. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 21:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Author of one self-published book, some unsourced TV appearances, no outside sources at all - the article appears to be totally self-promotion. I distrust anybody who feels compelled to add BOTH "Dr." and "PhD" to their name every place they go - especially when the article doesn't mention where or when she supposedly got that PhD. --MelanieN (talk) 22:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 23:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete absence of reliable sources, clearly fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 00:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails both WP:PROF as a non-notable academic and WP:FRINGE as a non-notable practitioner of a fringe science. Bearian (talk) 15:42, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Just a few days ago in another AfD I warned against assuming that an article was a puff piece just because the title included "Dr", but when the title is "Dr ... PhD" I'm really not inclined to do anything at all to help substantiate notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as having no coverage in reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 17:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.