Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Eric Pearl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 05:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Eric Pearl[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable TB (talk) 15:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment His book does appear to exist [[1]]. Also, Google has lots of coverage of the subject [[2]] Is the subject notable? I honestly don't know. But this article could be of a much higher quality than it is now. (Also, a strict application of WP:BLP that unsourced information should be removed would leave absolutely no content, letting an A3 speedy go through. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 18:15, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yes, the book exists. The rest of the article is pure promotion/hype, and completely unsourced. Also - a nitpick in case article is kept - the article title should be changed to "Eric Pearl", without the "Dr." When I created an article about a physician I was informed in no uncertain terms that the article title should be just his name, without "Dr." or "M.D." --MelanieN (talk) 03:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, not proven and not sourced. "He is the discoverer, practitioner and promoter of..." seems to sum up the content. Gilo ö 04:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probably better suited to being posted on craigslist than here. Sources as well needed. Direly. DRosin (talk) 11:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.