Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Sam Rizk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 00:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Sam Rizk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability in question, article has been speedy deleted before, can't find third party sources to back up claims made in article Karl 334 ^{☞Talk ☜} 15:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - this seems to be an advert. --Salimfadhley (talk) 16:54, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, salt if necessary, non-notable advert. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could not find verification of the article's claims at Google Scholar or at Pub Med. He does have publications (BTW he appears in author listings as Rizk SS) but they do not appear to be heavily cited or groundbreaking. Google News finds press releases. --MelanieN (talk) 15:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pure advertising, non-notable; article makes many non-verifiable claims. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 04:50, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.