Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Idupuganti Bhooshana Rao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 14:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Idupuganti Bhooshana Rao[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~clealry copied from another site--see [1], "The members of the profession will learn many important facets of his life from recollections of his colleagues and students."~~ DGG ( talk ) 05:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Peacock-language aside, this is somewhat borderline. But I am not seeing any reliable sources with his bio. Passing references... but in the end, he was just a forensic professional, doing his job. He hold a few positions of semi-significance, but nothing that seems to make him notable by default. Not every hospital director or equivalent is notable. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:42, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider for acceptance . Sir, major corrections have been done to this article with citation of relevant references.Other statements without references has been deleted. This Forensic Pathologist is notable person for introduction of Postgraduate courses in India and as founder of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. User:drsurajfm11:05, 27 August , 2015 (UTC)
Strong Keep Generates impressive English-language coverage for "just a forensic professional". How many average forensic professionals investigate the murder of the Prime Minister of India? How many average forensic professionals establish the Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine? WP:GEOBIAS is of relevance here. If you look at Category:Pathologists by nationality, you'll see that for a country of 318 million, the United States has 134 pathologist articles. India, a country of 1.252 billion has 13. Dr. Idupuganti Bhooshana Rao investigated the death of the Prime Minister of a nation of 1.252 billion. Earl Rose (coroner) should have been allowed to conduct the John F. Kennedy autopsy, but apparently he, and the actual autopsy itself are both entitled to articles. To make matters even more hilarious, the Pink Chanel suit of Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy gets its own article as well. Reminds me of Oprah Winfrey "You get a car, and you get a car, and you get a car! Everybody gets a car!" Sometimes Wikipedia makes me despair of the Western world. AusLondonder (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nommed as a copyvio or cut and paste? Or something. Link [2] report if you think it's a cut and paste. The references look good and they are third party. Notability isn't even brought up... Im not sure whats going on here --Savonneux (talk) 20:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Consider for acceptance . Sir, Sources are available related to subject in books and Scholars. Kindly search with Dr. I. Bhooshana Rao instead of Dr. Idupuganti Bhooshana Rao. Check the link https://www.google.co.in/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Dr.+Idupuganti+Bhooshana+Rao%22&gws_rd=cr&ei=RzfgVYDBPMm1uQS9qLeYAw#tbm=bks&q=%22Dr.+I.+Bhooshana+Rao%22 User:drsurajfm10:18, 28 August , 2015 (UTC)
Keep He was clearly a significant figure in his field. That said, the article should be renamed to drop the title. Also, it needs to be edited.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly keep. Sir, Importance of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine is already mentioned in Forensic Pathology in Wikipedia. User:drsurajfm 06:55, 29 August , 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 07:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article has been much improved since I nominated it; the overpromotional material that was clear copyvio has been removed. I would in its present form not nominated it for deletion. I can;t technically withdraw the AfD because there's another delete comment. "Just a forensic professional doing his job" is the sort of dismissive comment that can be applied to anyone whom one does not immediately recognize as famous. As we was founder and head of the national society in his field, it certainly does not apply to him. 71.167.144.135 (talk) 23:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.