Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Franklin's Island

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Franklin's Island[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced orphan, tagged since 2009 Brad7777 (talk) 00:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The ophan tag has been there since 2009, I have added the unsourced tag today Brad7777 (talk) 00:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~*Delete~~ Stricken, see below. Author is notable and so are some of her works, but not this one. There are quite a lot of reviews, but mainly on "user-generated content" sites. Can't find the kind of detailed coverage needed to establish notability. Tigerboy1966 01:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Google News search above demonstrates that multiple organizations have picked the books. Likewise, there is at least one good Google Scholar reference, and coverage in Sci Fi encyclopedias listed in Google Books. It appears the previous !voter did not look at those sources. Jclemens (talk) 23:37, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~Can you provide some links to those sources? (I don't see many.)~~ I wouldn't mind working on this. Goodvac (talk) 23:45, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Jclemens (talk) 23:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've sourced all statements in the article and have added a "Reception" section. Also, this book is extensively discussed in "When Science Blurs the Boundaries: The Commodification of the Animal in Young Adult Science Fiction" from the academic journal Science Fiction Studies. Goodvac (talk) 01:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Changing opinion in light of sources added. Tigerboy1966 02:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep this well-sourced article. Nominator apparently failed to check for sources. -- 202.124.75.63 (talk) 11:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm glad someone took the time to look for reliable sources. I found another one at SF Site that reviewed the book. [1] Dream Focus 16:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good work on referencing article. Notable work by notable author. DiverScout (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.