Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Elizabeth Duke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Bongwarrior (talk) 00:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Elizabeth Duke[edit]

Word-for-word copy of [1]. May not be a copyvio since that's a US federal gov't website, but I'm not sure. Dougie WII (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doug. I am an employee of HRSA creating this page to link it internally from the HRSA wiki page. Can you please let me know what should be done to keep this page from being deleted. Thanks. --Mulysse (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Wikipedia is not meant to be a free web host for your organization, but since this person must be considered notable and worthy of inclusion I guess you need to show that this document is in the public domain as a work of the U.S. government, or rewrite the article in your own words citing verifiable, reliable 3rd party sources. -- Dougie WII (talk) 22:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep unless it's a copyright violation. Rename without "Dr." Fg2 (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable position; fully agree with above. JJL (talk) 22:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable, and expand with outside sources. The source is not copyvio--well established principle. DGG (talk) 14:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as notable and not a copyvio. I'll move it if nobody else wants to do the dirty deed. Bearian (talk) 19:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Duke already exists as a redirect to a manufacturor. Bearian (talk) 19:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I would suggest moving this article over the existing redirect, then hatlinking this biography article to the manufacturer. Absent compelling reason otherwise, biographies should probably be primary targets. Serpent's Choice (talk) 17:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.