Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr.Rajesh Kotecha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 00:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr.Rajesh Kotecha[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Time to put a stop to this. Author, an SPA, has tried this article enough times by now (also as Rajesh Kotecha and Wikipedia:Rajesh Kotecha). Kotecha's clinic was deleted as promotional (Wikipedia:Chakrapani Ayurveda--that clinic's website is here, FYI).

Vanity biography for a non-notable person. Speedy was declined with reference to the Awards section; there is only one actual award there, and there is no indication that this is a notable one, nor is the sourcing at all reliable. Drmies (talk) 15:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:SCHOLAR. I am unable to find secondary sources that would indicate notability, either general or based on academic achievements. -- Scray (talk) 03:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A single associated document in GS that has never been cited is telling. Agricola44 (talk) 15:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete and salt. No evidence of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:14, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy DeleteAfd is a waste of time. It should be speedily deleted. Solomon7968 (talk) 08:01, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'd speedy tagged it, since it was a copy of another speedily deleted article (Rajesh Kotecha), and since I believe that it does not credibly assert importance, much less notability. --bonadea contributions talk 18:35, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (with extreme prejudice). Lesion (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.