Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doyle Branch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 19:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doyle Branch[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I just don't see how an intermittent stream testified to only on topo maps is notable. We have of late deleted several short German creeks which had better testimony; this one I cannot even see on aerials. Mangoe (talk) 18:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Doyle Branch is labelled and clearly runs its course on ACME's topo map.74.83.4.200 (talk) 04:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Appears on a map" is not a valid keep argument per WP:NGEO. Reywas92^Talk 14:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per NGEO: "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist." The guideline also excludes maps and databases from establishing notability. This leaves the Carter County Place Names source, which really doesn't amount to significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 22:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.