Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Down to Earth (Bee Gees song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating. :) Please assume good faith with my decision. If you believe this article was deleted without good reason, please request undeletion at deletion request, not my talk page. Thank you. SarahStierch (talk) 03:56, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Down to Earth (Bee Gees song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Song not released as single. Non-charting. Non-notable. Lyrical and production info are pure WP:OR. Fails WP:NMUSIC ES &L 13:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing notable about this song.TheLongTone (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Every song on the album on which this piece appears has its own page. It would seem that this song would at least be notable as a part of a million-selling album, but maybe not. I would suggest that the author of this page do some more in-depth research about the song, possibly reviewing some bios or auto-bios about the Bee Gees and maybe about the album. BrianThibodeaux (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Every song on the album has its own page because either a single user operating three accounts or three users with identical editing characteristics and very similar usernames have created pages. Almost all are the same, a poorly written description of a song with no claim to notability such as criical attention, cover versions which have been hits, &c. Its pure fancruft, & would be better included in the album article.TheLongTone (talk) 00:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because all are similar articles by same editor about album tracks or in some cases b-sides of singles with no assertion of notability:

above added by TheLongTone (talk) 02:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.