Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Schmidt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Doug Schmidt[edit]
- Doug Schmidt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No RS found, no G-New, mentioned once in passing on google books Weaponbb7 (talk) 17:19, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cautious Delete I also could not find any reliable sources. However, because Doug/Douglas Schmidt is a very common name, it appears frequently in news and scholarly sources, making it hard to exhaustively search through this material. It's possible that we're missing sources. But I suppose the burden is on people arguing to keep to provide sources, if there are any? Cazort (talk) 17:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails notability criteria for authors. Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.