Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Keirstead
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Doug Keirstead[edit]
- Doug Keirstead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:Soldier notability Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I see from the page history the page was nominated for deletion before (not by me) but the page author removed the deletion tag Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Have to say I don't see the notability. Mangoe (talk) 12:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this minor military bureaucrat. Qworty (talk) 20:28, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Junior officer with no particular claim to notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:29, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.