Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Karr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Karr[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced BLP who fails WP:GNG, created by a promotional SPA who edited solely on this topic. All of his films either do not have articles or are at AfD for the same reason. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Canada. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article is unsourced and has some promotional overtones, and I have been unable to find any sourcing that would bolster passage of WP:GNG even on searches of ProQuest and Newspapers.com. Bearcat (talk) 13:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not meet notability requirements Proton Dental (talk) 00:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete IMDb is not reliable, and cannot be used as a source, so this article has no acceptable sources at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:DIRECTOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.