Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doublespeak argument
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Doublespeak argument[edit]
- Doublespeak argument (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Apparently original research. Cf. [1] Przepla (talk) 18:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Comment. I've added a CSD G12 tag to this article as a blatant copyvio. Should be gone within an hour or so.
Sorry, misread that, the article in question is quoting Wikipedia, not the other way round. Oops. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 20:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research. John254 17:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete original research. B.Wind (talk) 04:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.