Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double II Set

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bloods. Given that this has already been relisted twice, I think it is not very likely that more participants will appear, so I am closing this with the two opinions voiced up till now. There is no consensus to keep or delete, but both participants in the debate suggest merging to Bloods. So done. Randykitty (talk) 17:33, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Double II Set[edit]

Double II Set (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable street gang set. No indication of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. Closest thing to notability seems to be a federal indictment. Only reliable source used in the article is a dead link to a govt. document. Fails WP:ORG. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:36, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete An unknown gang's sect whose only reference is a broken link. Not notable enough to warrant a page. Psychotic Spartan 123 05:39, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Topic meets WP:GNG. Simply clicking on the find sources links above provides some sources. Source examples include:
Another option is to merge to Bloods. North America1000 07:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I considered some of those. They are more news reports that something occurred than significant coverage of the set. In other words, almost any gang name could be substituted and you'd never know the difference. Redirecting to the Bloods article would be fine. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.