Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorsey Hall (Miami University)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dorsey Hall (Miami University)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Routine hall of residence, with no specially notable architecture or history, and only very local references. DGG ( talk ) 16:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. Could be merged into list of university buildings, but no such animal currently exists. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 15:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question. Can this and the Laws Hall (Miami University) be merged into a single residence hall article? Bearian (talk) 22:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Why would you want to do that? Laws Hall isn't a dormitory. - Eureka Lott 00:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the university article. I've seen articles on "Buildings of ____ University" or "_____ University campus", so presumably such an article could be put together for Miami. There's some good content here that would be good in such an article, so deletion would be unhelpful, and this wouldn't make a bad redirect anyway. Nyttend (talk) 23:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not entirely sure it would be that likely of a search term, so I don't see the need to create a redirect. If someone wanted to create one in the future because they saw a need, I would not be opposed, but I think deletion is fine right now. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.