Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorothy Day Center for Faith and Justice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Xavier University - Although sources have been provided they're extremely weak anyway consensus is to merge.,. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 22:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Day Center for Faith and Justice[edit]

Dorothy Day Center for Faith and Justice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization, fails WP:BEFORE. The organization itself hosts its website on Blogspot, which is not something one would expect for a something that was notable. References in article are largely published by unreliable sources or by related religious entities, making them non-independent. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 17:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or at best, Merge to Xavier University. The article seems to be about a campus ministry at Xavier University. Google news shows 2 sources which mention it in passing. It fails WP:CLUB as there is hardly any coverage in independent and reliable source. It is also unclear if their scope of activities is national/international. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:46, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changed to merge (diff). A small mention in the parent university article is sufficient. Doesn't merit its own article at the moment. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:00, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, hence weak keep. Thanks for the backhanded compliment. Bearian (talk) 13:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.