Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorgi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Royal corgis. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dorgi[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trivial mentions of the cross-breed, all relate to the late British Queen bar one. Information is better off being put into Royal Corgis and list of crossbreeds with the page redirecting to list of crossbreeds Traumnovelle (talk) 19:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Royalty and nobility, and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Merge/redirect to Royal corgis. It's already listed in List of dog crossbreeds. Google scholar agrees: the ony thing notable about this mix is that its greatest champion was the Queen. This could easily be contained to the short paragraph. There are several published sources so I will defer to the consensus. Annwfwn (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Royal corgis, though that should be moved to Royal Corgis (which weirdly does not even exist as a redirect yet). Standardised breeds take capitals, per MOS:LIFE (and that includes Corgis), while non-standardised varieties, like random cross-breeds someone sticks a name on, e.g. "dorgi" and "cockapoo", do not. So "dorgi" should not be capitalised in the merged material. I've already fixed this at the erstwhile article. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 07:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.