Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doostang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete — Caknuck (talk) 06:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Doostang

Doostang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

WP:WEB. Its not the subject of multiple non-trivial pieces of coverage from reliable sources. One link is dead, in the other it is not the subject. Its been tagged for notability far too long. If notability is there either establish it or remove the article appropriately. Crossmr (talk) 00:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

• Weak delete Some coverage, but almost all trivial. One possible source, but subscription is needed:[1]. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 02:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

  possible is right. We can't analyze it to know that's not a press release.--Crossmr (talk) 02:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete nothing but trivia. Twenty Years 03:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.