Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump Prophecy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump Prophecy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is presented in essay style without indication of an actual existence of a "Donal Trump Prophecy". It lacks notability as such and is on the border line to soapboxing. Jake Brockman (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for too many reasons to count. Its basically an essay chock full of original research and synthesis. The vast majority of the "sources" being used are either Youtube videos or social media posts, neither of which can be used as reliable sources. As the nominator pointed out, there's not even any evidence that a "Donald Trump Prophecy" even exists as a notable concept. The whole thing is just a messy personal essay on a completely fringe subject. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 18:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Redundant content fork of Donald Trump and poorly sourced essay. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 18:37, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Pretty clearly fails NOR, NPOV. Smmurphy^(Talk) 18:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete OR, POV. Time to SNOW close. No possible reason this should be kept. South Nashua (talk) 18:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I prophesy rapid deletion of this WP:OR. WP:SOAPBOX.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poorly written essay. No encyclopedic purpose. AusLondonder (talk) 10:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As the author I say "too many reasons to count" is no reason at all, and "fringe subject" is anti-Christian bias. I quoted 5 well known Christians serving in well-established Christian organizations with 13 references, all of which are dated before election and verifiable. Since their predictions have proven true, it should be reported. There is no reason to hide such information. You may dislike my "essay writing" and you may dislike the fact that God spoke through His representatives, ahead of the most important election, about the most powerful man on earth, but that in no book or encyclopedia qualifies as fringe. It is a part of human knowledge that must be captured and shared for posterity. The few of us in this echo chamber know it will not happen through Wikipedia, as verifiable Christian sources have been dismissed as "hoax" and "fringe" and if I were to provide more reasons you will flag discussion as "editing war". Please delete it so I can show Christian ministers that their accurate predictions are considered "hoax" by Wikipedia editors. Let's see if their millions of followers will agree with the few who hold the editorial switch in this forum. To Wikipedia Admin: there are people who would love to fund you more when you stop your editors from heavy-handed editing and deleting based on personal and religious bias. The fact that you have "Christianity Proposed Deletion" and no other religion deletion category speaks for itself.

@McCardleDavis: Firstly re "The fact that you have "Christianity Proposed Deletion" and no other religion deletion category speaks for itself" - please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam. Secondly re "the most powerful man on earth" - please see Vladimir Putin. AusLondonder (talk) 03:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTESSAY, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:FRINGE, WP:NPOV and many more. --Joshualouie711^talk 15:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above (and nom) -TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.