Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Tjernagel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don Tjernagel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:ENTERTAINER. Coverage consists of local paper and press releases. I found one article in the Telegraph Herald. Jbh ^Talk 16:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 16:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 16:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 16:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 16:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and draft and userfy if needed as I see no obvious better improvement. BTW thanks Jbhunley for delsorting this yourself as I appreciate when users initiate it themselves (recently, I find myself using these more than the daily logs as it's easier and exact). SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:47, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 03:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.