Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Repella

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don Repella[edit]

This is a non-notable photographic artist per WP:BIO. Gary King (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article doesn't establish any of the WP:BIO criteria - if a reference can be provided to show that the international showing of his work has involved actual galleries instead of just billboards, that would allow him to qualify, however I can't find anything online, and his website is proving equally, if not, more difficult. Oh, wait, here's his bio, finally.... hm, nope, nothing notable there either. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 22:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A single blog entry[1] doesn't cut it as a multiple, independent, reliable secondary source material. A lot more will need to be added to meet WP:BIO. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 23:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.