Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don McCloskey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Core desat 06:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don McCloskey[edit]

Tagged for notability since April 2007; web search reveals a few blog hits but no reliable sources that I could find. "All but ignored by the music industry at large" == fails WP:MUSIC. Jfire (talk) 01:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete some recent news hits but they appear to be sheer concert/gig listings and filtered archives seem to be more of the same. Fails WP:MUSIC as no RS coverage Travellingcari (talk) 05:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: If it's impossible to describe his music, it's impossible to talk about it here, too. Without a label with distribution, there can be no airplay or sales, and without sales, there can be no market position, and without a market position, he's a guy playing music. I like guys playing music, but they don't often get to be in encyclopedias. Utgard Loki (talk) 16:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Deirdre McCloskey, a moderately famous economist. -Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 05:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S. note that the redirect was, in fact, the original contents of the page...... -Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 05:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, and advert-sounding language is one of my biggest pet peeves. SingCal 16:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.