Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Aters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don Aters[edit]

Don Aters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As you'll see from the history, I restored the previously sourced version but my searches found nothing to suggest further improvement (despite sources saying he's well known and such) with my best results here, here and here. Notifying still active editors FreeRangeFrog, Ironholds Paste and Jayron32 and notifying others Tbennert, WarthogDemon and thisandthem. This has existed since February 2008 but never with better improvement and I'm seeing any signs of it. SwisterTwister talk 23:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: No assertion of notability in the article. --Slashme (talk) 21:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 10:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.